Evidence to suggest Covid-19 is a contrived event

Below I will summarise the many reasons to support the evidence that Covid-19 is a contrived pandemic to subjugate the global population towards the elites. The elites are individuals who own massive multi-national corporations, heads of international organisations, royalty and other individuals we don’t see in the mainstream media.

Governments are slowly taking our freedoms away, we are being brainwashed by the media and many of the professionals are being deplatformed.

  1. Event 201

‘’The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.

In recent years, the world has seen a growing number of epidemic events, amounting to approximately 200 events annually. These events are increasing, and they are disruptive to health, economies, and society. Managing these events already strains global capacity, even absent a pandemic threat. Experts agree that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes global—a pandemic with potentially catastrophic consequences. A severe pandemic, which becomes “Event 201,” would require reliable cooperation among several industries, national governments, and key international institutions.’’

Click here for more

The same organisation put out a statement as people became suspicious that this ‘’tabletop exercise’’ may have simply just predicted this current pandemic.

‘’In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.’’

Please click here for more
  1. Covid-19 is not a High consequence infectious disease

As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK.

The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.

The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID.

The need to have a national, coordinated response remains, but this is being met by the government’s COVID-19 response.

Cases of COVID-19 are no longer managed by HCID treatment centres only. All healthcare workers managing possible and confirmed cases should follow the updated national infection and prevention (IPC) guidance for COVID-19, which supersedes all previous IPC guidance for COVID-19. This guidance includes instructions about different personal protective equipment (PPE) ensembles that are appropriate for different clinical scenarios.’

Please click here for the source

3. Lockdown has had a massive impact on healthcare with this as an example

Lets link point two and three. If Covid-19 isn’t considered a HCID then why has the government thought it’s necessary to stop many vital health services such as breast cancer screenings.

According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 is deadliest among older populations. In fact, through October 8, 92 percent of COVID-19 deaths nationwide have occurred among those ages 55 or older. Only 0.2 percent were younger than 25. This trend can also be found on the state level.

CDC data also show that Americans, regardless of age group, are far more likely to die of something other than COVID-19. Even among those in the most heavily impacted age group (85 and older), only 9.5 percent of all deaths since February 2020 were due to COVID-19.

COVID-19 Deaths by Age

The whole point of a pandemic is that a vast portion of the population are affected by the virus at hand. The statistics above clearly show Covid-19 isn’t nearly as deadly as the mainstream media will have you believe…

  1. Covid-19 age of death and multiple health issues

‘’The Rome-based institute has examined medical records of about 18% of the country’s coronavirus fatalities, finding that just three victims, or 0.8% of the total, had no previous pathology. Almost half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses and about a fourth had either one or two previous conditions. More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease.’’

The average age of those who’ve died from the virus in Italy is 79.5.

99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness, Italy Says

Let’s be clear that the average life expectancy in Italy is 83 alongside this many of the individuals that have died of this virus have had comorbidities. This means people who have died of the virus seem to have died while having weakened immune systems from battling other diseases. Does this mean they died from Covid-19? Or does it mean they tested positive from it while dying of other illnesses?

5. Outright lies

‘’ When it comes to COVID-19 there is the additional data skewer, that is –get this— there is no universal definition of COVID-19 death.  The Centers for Disease Control, updated from yesterday, April 4th, still states that mortality, quote unquote, data includes both confirmed and presumptive positive cases of COVID-19.

Translation?  The CDC counts both true COVID-19 cases and speculative guesses of COVID-19 the same.  They call it death by COVID-19.  They automatically overestimate the real death numbers, by their own admission.  Prior to COVID-19, people were more likely to get an accurate cause of death written on their death certificate if they died in the hospital.  Why more accurate when a patient dies in the hospital?  Because hospital staff has physical examination findings labs, radiologic studies, et cetera, to make a good educated guess.  It is estimated that 60 percent of people die in the hospital.  But even [with] those in-hospital deaths, the cause of death is not always clear, especially in someone with multiple health conditions, each of which could cause the death.

Click here for more information

This isn’t just the CDC but many other various healthcare agencies around the world.


6. Death certificates & Covid-19

‘’There is no formal requirement to have a positive Covid-19 test back in order to write this on a death certificate. Bear in mind that first tests are often negative in people who later do turn out to have Covid-19. ‘’

Click here for the full article

This article refutes the idea that doctors are not incentivised to put ‘’COVID-19’’ as cause of death however states a test doesn’t necessarily have to be taken to put COVID-19 on the death certificate. Isn’t that odd?

7. Wearing of face masks restrict your oxygen flow

When a person is ill they wear a mask, not the entire non-infected community/world. Or for those undergoing chemotherapy who are severely immune-compromised, it is recommended to wear a mask in public.

Click here for the full article

This makes sense. People who are sick e.g. coughing, sneezing etc – they should wear a mask to literally ‘’mask’’ their germs but not people who are not sick. Or as it says people who have extremely weak immune systems.

What do you think?


2 thoughts on “Evidence to suggest Covid-19 is a contrived event

  1. Not getting the vaccine, or as I like to put it staying in the control group. Things have been fishy since the start of the pandemic. where i live the local schools shut down in December and January of 2019-2020 from the “flu.” I was sick along with my wife in February, before the virus was in the country. then the over reaction and the fact that the virus has a 99.9% survival rate. I suggest reading The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab. it tells you what is going on.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: