The Georgia Guidestones is a mysterious monument located in Elberton County, Georgia in the United States the monument was built in 1980. The Guidestones are colloquially called ”the American Stonehenge” as both are astronomical calendars. However that’s where the similarities stop, as the Georgia Guidestones contain 10 guidelines for society but the guidelines are quite suspicious. Below I tackle the task of decoding the guidelines.
Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
The first guideline calls for population control in order to leave room for nature despite 95% of the human population living on 10% of the land. There are thousands of miles of land without any human habitation so why do we need our population to be reduced by a whopping 6.5 Billion? Now, I understand there is an argument whereby our ”throwaway” culture can’t be sustained due to our only limited amount of resources available on the earth, but its misleading to assume the reason for environmental damage is due to the human population alone. The issue isn’t population or lack of resources but the way its distributed. Reducing the Human population should never be a guideline for anything as it will most definitely involve murder. Every human life is of value and its imperative that everyone understands this.
This is not just a guideline but these are policies that are being put in place all over the world. Famously China’s one child policy, making abortions socially acceptable but also Egypt’s ”Two is enough” campaign.
Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
This guideline has massive undertones of eugenics a racist and elitist idea dated back to the Victorian era. Eugenics is the idea to ”breed” humans that are fit or have certain characteristics. Now what maybe fit to you may not be fit to me. Fit for who’s agenda and what characteristics are disadvantageous?
Many high profile individuals talk about world population and how reproduction needs to be controlled. The most vocal appears to be Bill Gates but other high profile people appear suspiciously concerned about human population.
The presenter below outlines the danger of eugenics and the idea of reducing the human population.
Unite humanity with a living new language.
This guideline may sound benign but this too has massive ramifications if this guideline was to be rolled out. To unit Humans with one living language would mean to use One world language to replace or have dominance over other languages which there are thousands of. In the past this normally came with alot of violence towards some groups including but not limited to Aboriginal Australians, Irish, enslaved Africans – they were indoctrinated to speak English, French, Spanish etc and told not to speak their mother tongue. Will this be repeated in the future uniting Humanity with one language and criminalises people who speak their mother tongue? If so this could be labelled cultural genocide.
Could the predominance of the English language be their new language of choice?
Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
I interpret this guideline to meaning to not let traditions cloud judgement of your ability to reason. This is definitely needed as to reason means to be rational and have the ability to be balanced. But is this guideline necessary? Of course you can make an argument to say are any of the guidelines necessary (there not) but do we need to be told… literally written in stone to use ”tempered reason”
Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
Another ambiguous guideline which is up to interpretation which I believe to be by design. To better understand this guideline is to give context to it. There are no fair laws or just courts as yet on this Earth as many of the criminals within the high echelons of society never serve justice with countless examples. One example is the massive child sexual abuse scandal surrounding Jimmy Saville, a British entertainer who only served any kind of justice after his death. This is despite many individuals reporting his acts of cruelty while he was alive.
Another issue with this guideline like the others are ”just” for whom? Will people in high places be held accountable for their acts of cruelty such as Tony Blair and George Bush war crimes in Iraq and Afghanistan? Will Boris Johnson be criminalised for imposing draconian Lockdown policies towards the British population? Will it be acknowledged he caused the suicides of thousands of people who couldn’t survive the lockdown? I think not.
So I will ask again, ”just” for whom?
Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
The centralisation of power in a ”world court” may sound convenient but we all know convenience doesn’t always equal to a better outcome. A world court already exists its called the International court of justice despite such a benevolent sounding organisation existing many individuals who commit crimes against humanity are never prosecuted. One example of these crimes against humanity include the Saudi Arabian led genocide against the Yemeni people.
Based on the information available to it using open sources, YDP reports that two-thirds of the coalition’s bombing attacks have been against non-military and unknown targets. The coalition isn’t accidentally attacking civilians and civilian infrastructure – it’s doing it deliberately.Click here for more details
Another example where the benevolent sounding ”International court of justice” fails to supposedly do its job is the concentration camps for the Uighur people in the People’s republic of China.
Economic, cultural and religious discrimination against Uighurs had been brewing for decades. But in 2014, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced a new “People’s War on Terror” aimed at fighting regional ‘terrorists’ and ‘separatists’, heralding a new era of mass surveillance, gargantuan police presence and skyrocketing arbitrary imprisonments of Uighurs in Xinjiang.Click here for the full article
Such despicable treatment is allowed while a ”international court of justice” exists is horrendous.
Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
When I think of members of the higher echelons of society whenever statements such as the above is made I always think of it in terms of Them and us – Us meaning the masses or the 99%. What petty laws? Could it be the conventions of Human rights which as long as they are not repealed will always scrutinise their mistreatment of the masses. To explain further I’ll need to link this point with the other guidelines – ”Maintain Humanity under 500,000 Million” well the only way to do this is to massively impede on our basic Human Rights by ”guiding reproduction wisely”.
Repealing the convention on Human rights would be the only way to reduce the world population and to take away an individual’s right to reproduce freely.
For further information on our Human rights please read this document.
Balance personal rights with social duties.
Again like the other guidelines the statement above is very ambiguous, could pertain to anything but what if I disagree with those social duties? What if our ”leaders” put forth the idea that one of our social duties were to decrease our consumption of animal meat? What if the replacement of animal meat was eating synthetic meat? Sounds crazy but Billionaire Bill Gates wants you to eat Synthetic meat.
Mr Gates, who has invested in range of ‘synthetic meat’ startups including Impossible Foods, Beyond Meat, Memphis Meats and Hampton Creek Foods, made the comments in an interview promoting his new book ‘How to Avoid a Climate Disaster’.
In the interview with MIT Technology Review, Mr Gates said he did not think the poorest 80 countries in the world would be eating synthetic beef in future.
“I do think all rich countries should move to 100 percent synthetic beef,” he said.
We already know processed meats such as sausages, bacon and hotdogs are bad for human health due to the excess amounts of salt and preservatives so how can it be beneficial for us to eat something that is even more processed? Unlike processed meat, synthetic meat doesn’t contain any meat it is simply made up.
Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
This guideline sounds the best out of the 10 but if we should be prizing truth then why is the truth being hidden, censored and ridiculed?
Who’s truth are we prizing? The collective truth? Or truth which has been approved by international organisations which clearly do not have a our best interests at heart?
Be not a cancer on the Earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.
Humans are not a cancer on the Earth as the Human species are an integral part of the biosphere. In the 21st century we may have became detached from nature like never before but despite that we are still very much a species of this Earth. How can a living creature such as Humans be a cancer on the earth?
Leave room for nature? There is plenty room for nature this idea that the Earth is somehow crammed full of ”cancerous” humans is fundamentally genocidal. The thought makes individuals come to a very dangerous ”rational” conclusion that either humans need to be killed off or their reproduction controlled. According to the European commission roughly 95% of the world’s population live on 10% of the land. I’m not debunking the well known fact that the state of the natural habitat of many of our world’s ecosystems are in decline, but instead the idea that the population is the reason for this is a half-truth.
The real reason for habitat degradation is due to our economic system – Capitalism. The main beneficiaries of capitalism are the top 1% who rarely use public transportation, own massive mansions, eat in excess, use private jets, own massive multi-national corporations that do untold damage to the eco-system for financial gain.
So who and what is the real cancer?